Case Study  /  B2B commercial interiors  /  AI Visibility

It out-mentioned every rival in AI answers.

How a B2B commercial interiors firm became the name the engines reached for first, and described well.

19.78% share of voice, leading its set · brand sentiment 78

Sector
B2B commercial interiors
Engagement
Full AI Visibility Operating System
Focus
Presence, Authority & Sentiment
Tracked surface
ChatGPT · Gemini · Perplexity · Google AI Overviews · Google AI Mode

In short

A B2B commercial interiors firm became the name AI answers named first, and framed well. Across the tracked prompts and five AI engines, the firm reached 66.67% brand mention coverage, a 47.13% citation rate, an average AI ranking of 2.31, the leading 19.78% share of voice in its set, and a brand sentiment score of 78, out-mentioning every rival by a wide margin.

66.67%
Brand Mention Coverage (M)
116 mentions vs rivals at 17 to 42
47.13%
Citation Rate (C)
Cited in nearly half its answers
2.31
Average AI Ranking (R)
Top-tier position when named
19.78%
AI Share of Voice (SOV)
Leading share in its competitive set

01The starting point

In a considered B2B category where buyers shortlist a handful of firms, this commercial interiors business wanted to be the one the engines named first and described well. Two things mattered to it: how often it appeared relative to competitors, and in what light, since tone shapes a buyer's shortlist as much as presence does.

02What we built

Growth.pro built and ran the firm's AI Visibility Operating System through the PAVA Framework, on the AI Citation Enablement practice, making its expertise and project record easy for AI to find, verify and attribute.

P

Presence

A consistent, accurate entity definition across the sources AI reads, with stronger category definitions and clearer solution language for AI extraction.

V

Visibility

Content structured for answer clarity against the comparison and specification queries buyers put to the engines when scoping a project.

A

Authority

Genuine editorial standing earned through the firm's own channels, guided by our citation-source mapping, so independent sources described the firm accurately and well. We worked the category by topic, reinforcing the themes the firm already led, contesting the ones where several brands compete, and identifying the gaps worth building into next.

M

Amplification & measurement

Mention, citation, share of voice and sentiment were tracked continuously through our proprietary measurement infrastructure across the five engines.

03The results

AI Visibility Report snapshot showing Brand Mention Coverage 66.67%, Citation Rate 47.13%, Average AI Ranking 2.31 and AI Share of Voice 19.78%, the leading position, with a sentiment score of 78.
Fig. 01AI Visibility Report snapshot, M 66.67%, C 47.13%, R 2.31, SOV 19.78% (leading), Sentiment 78.

Across the tracked prompts and the five engines, the firm reached:

  • Brand Mention Coverage of 66.67%. Named in two of every three AI answers in its category.
  • Citation Rate of 47.13%, cited in nearly half its answers.
  • Average AI Ranking of 2.31 when named.
  • AI Share of Voice of 19.78%, the leading share in its set, well ahead of competitors at 4.7% and below.
  • A Brand Sentiment score of 78, indicating consistently positive framing in the sources AI reads.

The competitive gap was wide. The firm drew 116 brand mentions across the tracked answers, while its rivals sat between 17 and 42 each, and it earned the highest citation count in the set at 82.

Competitive AI performance showing the commercial interiors firm with 116 brand mentions against rivals at 17 to 42, a 19.8% share of voice well ahead of the field, the highest citation count at 82 and an average sentiment score of 78.
Fig. 02Competitive AI performance, 116 brand mentions versus rivals at 17 to 42, a 19.8% share of voice well ahead of the field, the highest citation count at 82, and an average sentiment score of 78.

Working the category by topic showed where the firm led, where it was contested, and where the open ground sat.

Key topics view splitting the category into brand leaders, battlegrounds and blind spots, guiding where to defend, contest and expand.
Fig. 03Key topics, the category split into brand leaders, battlegrounds and blind spots, guiding where to defend, contest and expand.
Individual tracked prompts showing most priority prompts at four-of-five or five-of-five brand coverage, with consistent top-three average positions across platforms.
Fig. 04Individual tracked prompts, most priority prompts at four-of-five or five-of-five brand coverage, with consistent top-three average positions across platforms.

The traffic was modest in volume but high in intent, as is typical for the category.

AI referral traffic showing 297 AI sessions, 156 engaged sessions and a 52.53% engagement rate, signalling high-intent discovery rather than casual browsing.
Fig. 05AI referral traffic, 297 AI sessions, 156 engaged sessions and a 52.53% engagement rate, signalling high-intent discovery rather than casual browsing.

04What it means

Out-mentioning every rival by a wide margin, while holding a sentiment score of 78, means the engines were not only naming this firm most often but describing it favourably when they did. In a category where buyers shortlist on both presence and reputation, that combination is decisive. Mention and citation coverage are strong, the framing is positive, and Recommendation is the natural next ground, earned as the lead compounds.

Key questions

How far ahead of rivals can a commercial interiors firm be in AI answers?

This firm drew 116 mentions while its rivals sat between 17 and 42 each, reaching 66.67% mention coverage, a 47.13% citation rate and the leading 19.78% share of voice across five engines.

How were the firm and its category described by AI?

It held a brand sentiment score of 78, consistently positive framing in the sources AI reads, so the engines named it most often and described it favourably when they did.

Which AI engines were measured?

ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode, tracked continuously through proprietary measurement infrastructure.

Measurement: AI brand mention and citation rates, share of voice and sentiment across tracked category queries on ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode, via Growth.pro's proprietary measurement infrastructure. Client anonymised pending naming permission.

See where your brand stands in AI search.

A complimentary AI Visibility Audit benchmarks your brand across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode against your top three category rivals.

Get your AI Visibility Audit