How a B2B services firm built AI visibility from a standing start and drew real traffic from the answers.
56.67% mention coverage · 2,971 sessions from AI answers
A B2B services firm with no AI-search strategy went from absent to cited in ninety days. Across the tracked prompts and five AI engines, the firm reached 56.67% brand mention coverage, a 40% citation rate, an average AI ranking of 2.56, and a 7.75% share of voice, and the visibility drew 2,971 sessions from AI answers over the same window, all from a standing start.
This firm came in with no AI-search strategy of any kind. It had never looked at how ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity described its category, whether it was named when buyers asked, or who got cited in its place. The question it put to us was direct: in ninety days, can a focused programme move us from absent to cited, and does that visibility actually send anyone to the site?
Growth.pro stood up the firm's AI Visibility Operating System and ran it through the PAVA Framework, on the AI Citation Enablement practice. The work was about making the firm's real expertise easy for AI to find, verify and attribute, on the brand's own side of the equation rather than against how the models evaluate.
We fixed the entity layer first: one accurate, consistent account of who the firm is and what it does, made legible across the sources AI reads, with clearer category descriptions so the models had something stable to anchor to.
We ran a prompt-level gap analysis across the firm's high-value B2B decision queries and rebuilt the core service pages so the answer to each question was clear and easy to extract, rather than buried.
As the foundations held, the firm moved from the occasional mention toward being cited as a source, with content structured to increase citation eligibility and a deliberate balance between owned and third-party citations.
The whole programme ran on continuous measurement through our proprietary measurement infrastructure, tracked weekly across the five engines over the ninety days, connecting AI mentions to actual sessions and key events.
Inside the ninety-day window, from no prior AI presence, the firm reached:
The visibility did not sit still on a dashboard. Over the same window the firm drew 2,971 sessions from AI answers, with 2,093 engaged sessions, a 70.45% engagement rate and 113 key events such as CTA clicks and conversions.
The outcomes that matter in AI search are Mention, Citation and Recommendation. In ninety days the firm went from absent to named in more than half of its category answers and cited in two of five, with the traffic and engagement to show the visibility was real rather than cosmetic. Recommendation, the suggested-choice position, is not a metered number; it is what a brand earns as its standing deepens, and the trajectory here pointed that way. For a firm that started with nothing in AI search, ninety days was enough to stop being invisible.
Yes. From no AI-search strategy, this firm reached 56.67% mention coverage, a 40% citation rate, an average AI ranking of 2.56, and a 7.75% share of voice across five engines within ninety days.
Yes. Over the same ninety days the firm drew 2,971 sessions from AI answers, real traffic arriving from the engines rather than from traditional search.
ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode, tracked weekly through proprietary measurement infrastructure.
Measurement: AI brand mention and citation rates across tracked category queries on ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode, with AI-referred traffic via analytics, through Growth.pro's proprietary measurement infrastructure. Client anonymised pending naming permission.
A complimentary AI Visibility Audit benchmarks your brand across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode against your top three category rivals.